Leadership And Corporate Culture
Culture is generally defined as the ways of the people. The way they talk, dress, eat, etc, is defined as culture. Everybody no matter the class, back...
Culture is generally defined as the ways of the people. The way they talk, dress, eat, etc, is defined as culture. Everybody no matter the class, background, ethnicity, race, country, all have a ruling dogma that dictates ones lifestyle. Culture is not restricted to the larger world alone, it is also narrow down to operative fore walls of organizations like: offices, organization, companies, call it whatever you like, they are all the same word describing the same concept. Corporate culture is simply how things get done in an office. Leadership and corporate culture therefore examines the various cultural elements existing in a corporate entity and the role of leadership in getting things done. Does leadership really have a role to play in organizational culture? If yes, what is the role of management? Evans and Burman (2008) in their assertion that leadership influences culture rather than management, confirms that there is indeed a difference between leadership and management. What is the purpose of leadership and corporate culture in an organization? Has it any similarity to the relevance of cultural practice in the larger world? To shed more light on this the purpose or advantages of culture shall be examined.
Culture And Ethics
Culture has a one way influence on ethics because it dictates to a large extends how people should ascribe values to their beliefs. Ethics is defined as a set of moral philosophies. It is the recognition of what is bad or good. Under cultural umbrella what is ethically good is influenced by general belief of people from a certain region. A perfect example is the Chinese use of long sticks for eating, some African use of bare hands in eating native dishes etc. While an African might view eating with sticks unethical because it is simply not their culture, the Chinese view may also view eating with bare hands as absolutely unacceptable, why, because it is strange and therefore not acceptable. However, in this modern times, things are changing there is a cross cultural adaptation or tolerance. To disprove insensitivity and fractions that use to be a consequence of cultural intolerance people are learning to accept other people’s culture and not view its right and wrong solely on “ethical” grounds but on people’s point of view. The same analogy given above is also ascribed to leadership and corporate culture settings.
All organization has a distinctive culture that must be observed by workers in the company. The way workers are ordered to go about things in the organizational settings may differ slightly or largely from others, and the purpose? It varies, below are some of the reasons or importance of organizational culture.
Relevance Of Culture In An Organization
1. Identification: What differentiates bank of America from Wachovia bank? You will no doubt says organization operations, if that is your answer you are right, but put in a more informal language, it is culture. Starting from their names, to company logo, to internal operational structures, all depicts cultural behavior. In the society too culture emphasizes identity. A Nigerian can be identified by his or her outfit, speech; same goes for an American, British stilted nasal influenced way of talking and so on. So without necessarily declaring who you are, your culture takes the responsibility off you.
2. Leadership and corporate culture enables workers especially leaders to recognize their traits and its impacts to the organization
3. Culture in an organization determines an organization ability, endurance, and efficiency
4. corporate culture adds in no small measures to the organization’s image and brand
5. It adds zeal and speed to corporate activities
Leadership And Corporate Culture
The relevance of culture in an organization is indeed a great one, but how one would make it work, it is one to create policies, and another to enforce it. Some schools of thought have argued that to get the work done in an organization requires a force to execute it. Leadership is therefore voted as the best resource that will yield great result in carrying out cultural tenets in organizations. How? Leadership unlike management is not a structure rather it veers more towards habits, which includes carrying people along, by supporting and showing all human tendencies in achieving corporate goals.
It adds human face to protocols. Humans respond more to leaders because leadership brings about constructive cluster. So for management to succeed in its aim, it requires someone with leadership traits that will lead workers and the organization as a whole into an efficient execution of cultural responsibilities.
Every organization, big or small, needs leadership and corporate culture in achieving corporate goals.
Incoming search terms:
- corporate culture and leadership
- burman and evans (2008)
- what is the difference between corporate culture and organisational culture
- role of leadership in corporate culture
- the role of management in organisational culture
- role of culture and leadership in mordern organisations
- organisation culture Evans and Burman 2008
- leadership v management Burman and Evans (2008)
- leadership in various cultural setting
- important for organisations to have a distinctive culture

